Oman and Iran's superior hand test

According to the Mehr News Agency, the 400th issue of Hezbollah Weekly was published with an editorial about the indirect negotiations ahead.

You read this number in part of the editorial:

… Although the American side is trying to pretend to have a superior hand in this context, it is the reality that it is the superior hand with Iran so far and in practice. This superiority is currently evident in three cases: the need for the negotiations to be limited to the nuclear case, the place of negotiations, and finally the indirect negotiations.

Concerning the limited negotiations to the nuclear issue, although the US government has somehow retreated, it should not and cannot be optimistic and, consequently. Americans are accustomed to lies and abuses and may move uneven issues by starting or in the middle of the negotiations. The indirectness of the negotiations causes Iran to abandon itself at a much lower cost if they want to blackmail the other party and push unexpected issues such as defense and regional issues.

The reason for Trump's space and lying on the type of negotiations is the same. He is trying to force Iran to negotiate directly by creating psychological operations and media pressure, while the American side has practically agreed to the indirectness of the negotiations.

The full text of this editorial is as follows:

With the news that the US president announced Monday night at the White House, Sir has entered a new and more prolific phase. Trump, who hosted the Zionist criminal prime minister, told reporters in the White House Owal room that a very large meeting between the US and Iran will be held on Saturday, and the meeting will be held directly and at a high level. In the following, he made the same repetitive claim and claimed that the agreement was good for Iran, but if the negotiations fail, it would have a lot of bad consequences for Iran; That is the old stick and carrot politics!

Foreign Minister Sayed Abbas Arakchi, who was on his way to Algeria, wrote on his account on a social network a few hours later: “Iran and the states of Oman will meet indirect dialogue at high officials on Saturday. This is an opportunity as well as a test. The ball is on the US. ” Subsequent additional news shows that the talks were to be held with the presence of Mr. Sayyed Abbas Iraqi by Iran and US Special Envoy in West Asian affairs.

Immediately after Trump's remarks, analysis, speculation, and extensive comments were released on the media and social media. The Western and anti -revolutionary media have worked hard and, by publishing a multitude of various material, attempted to instill that the Islamic Republic had withdrawn from its previous stance on negotiating with the United States and responded to the pressure of the Trump administration. Trump's sudden announcement was also the case of a wide wave of media space and various doubts.

Why is Trump interested in surprise?

Trump's surprise stance on negotiating with Iran was not a new issue on Monday night. He also followed the same method about sending a letter to the Islamic Republic of Iran, and in a very surprise and sudden way, he said in a television interview that he wrote a letter to Iran and wanted to negotiate; A letter that arrived in Iran a few days later!

Such encounters with these sensitive issues are not very common in the world of diplomacy, and it can be said that it is outside the classic rules of the world of diplomacy and international relations; But Trump is keen to be different in almost all areas, and instead of carrying out such things from the common channels, he enters himself and directly plays a role. Regardless of the fact that it is rooted in Trump's political psychology, his main purpose of these media games is to influence public opinion in general, and to Iranians in particular.

This is not the case from the revolutionary leader's point of view, and in the case of sending a letter, he said: “The US President says we are ready to negotiate with Iran and invite the negotiation and claim that a letter that has not been reached; I mean not to come to me. It is a deception of the world's public opinion; “This means that we are negotiating, we want to negotiate, make peace, there is no fight, Iran refuses to negotiate.” 1/4/11

Trump's Monday's statements can be seen as a continuation of this line; A line that tries to public opinion around the world as well as inside Iran that the United States is seeking serious negotiation and resolving issues between the two countries, but it is the Islamic Republic that is not interested in it.

Why did it agree with indirect negotiation?

One of the doubts that the enemy was publishing and spreading hours after Trump's remarks is that the Islamic Republic of Iran has withdrawn against the pressures and threats of the Trump administration and agree to negotiate is the result of such a process. The recent position of the US Secretary of State can also be evaluated and analyzed.

What is the reason for Iran's agreement to negotiate with the US? A look at the events and positions of the US government shows that Americans have always sought a vicious agreement after leaving the brokerage. The indirect negotiations with the United States to revive the brokerage have been underway for both Mr. Rouhani's government and the martyr Raisi government for the past few years, and the Islamic Republic has not been turned away. What prevented the conclusion of the negotiations was the blackmail of Americans and the raising issues.

In mid -February 2008, Trump, who had just returned to the White House, signed an official document on Iran; A document entitled “Presidential Note on National Security”. In this document, as in the past, a variety of claims and blackmail about Iran is raised; From the nuclear issue to the Islamic Republic of Iran defense and regional issues. Reason and logic dictates that in such circumstances, one must stand firm against the enemy and reject the surrender and reconciliation under the heading of “negotiation”.

The US military threats and the country's mobility have also failed to create a shake -up in Tehran's calculations. The story was different from where Trump, in his letter, withdrew somehow from his former positions and showed the green light on limited negotiations to the nuclear issue. This, in addition to the US government's heavy effort to imply the Islamic Republic of Iran to raise tensions to the public opinion of the world, and especially the people of our country, to summarize the Islamic Republic's response to the letter; The response that led both the way to interact with the indirect framework of the negotiations and a decisive stance against Trump's riddles.

The top hand of the Islamic Republic

Although the American side is trying to pretend to have superior hand in this companionship, it is the reality that it is the best hand with Iran so far and in practice. This superiority is currently evident in three cases: the need for limited negotiations to the nuclear case, the place of negotiations, and finally the indirect negotiations.

Concerning the limited negotiations to the nuclear issue, although the US government has somehow retreated, it should not and cannot be optimistic and, consequently. Americans are accustomed to lies and abuses and may move uneven issues by starting or in the middle of the negotiations. The indirectness of the negotiations causes Iran to abandon itself at a much lower cost if they want to blackmail the other party and push unexpected issues such as defense and regional issues.

The reason for Trump's space and lying on the type of negotiations is the same. He is trying to force Iran to negotiate directly by creating psychological operations and media pressure, while the American side has practically agreed to the indirectness of the negotiations.

Two serious warning

However, the indirect negotiations of Iran and the United States will begin in Oman on Saturday next week, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is currently superior, but there are two very important and serious points.

First, because experience has shown that Americans refuse to negotiate and agree to a fair agreement because of their arrogant spirit and bullying. So reason and wisdom dictate that any taste at the level of officials, the media and society should be avoided. The taste and even optimism about sending the wrong message to the enemy is to put the Iranian team under pressure.

The second point is that if the situation is in a way that reaches an agreement between the two countries in the future, this agreement will not be a solution to Iran's economic problems. The external agreement on one side is the hope of “imaginary dots”. Solving the country's economic problems requires a continuous and profound effort by the authorities and the people's companionship. About a decade ago, during the negotiations leading to the Brotherhood, we have suffered many blows from this area. The magnification of the story and the tie of the country's small and large issues to negotiate and delay their decisions and plans and their compliance with the outcome of the negotiations caused huge damage to the country, making the decade into a special decade and a teaching decade. It is by no means wise and worthy of repeating the same mistakes and costs. Any simplification of the negotiations and its possible economic consequences is harmful and poison.

Saturday, in the most optimistic way, is the beginning of a hard and twisty way; Along this path must be unity and cohesion.

Preservation of public opinion

Another important point is that Trump has shown that in interacting with Iran on playing with public opinion, it has personally entered the field. With the start of the talks in Oman, it is likely that this media and psychological game will also be exacerbated. In such circumstances, the authorities must take care of this thesis and, with the courage, courage and tact, to disrupt the other party's play, not to be passive and purely passive. People should also note that the country and officials, especially the negotiating team, are facing special and complex conditions, as the enemy is trying to suspicious public opinion and promoting various doubts with various goals.