The third hearing of the “Rostami Safa” case was held

The third session of the second part of the case, Rostami Safa's case, was held in the second branch of the Tehran Special Economic Crime Criminal Court, both morning and evening, according to the Mehr News Agency.

At the hearing, the Central Bank's representatives declared the banking system and the banking system, if not settled with the operating banks, declared the banking system loss and received any riyal facilities in any way and its failure to return, even though the contracts extended, as a form of money creation, which eventually led to the shrinkage of the people.

According to what the central bank's representatives have stated, the entry of the goods does not cause the customer's commitment to the bank, but it must settle the same currency with the bank unless in specific cases.

Central Bank representatives also stated that the money that is currently rotating in the banking system is not physical and inherent in the value of gold and silver, and the parties have the power to buy money; So economically, if one has taken a sum years ago, it is not fair, as if it were worth two thousand tomans, but at present it is not valuable than ever before.

Regarding the jurisdiction of the prosecutor's court, the prosecutor stated that, in accordance with Article 2 of the Executive Regulations No. 2/4/7/7/11 Advocacy The approved and emphasized that all courts are obliged to submit cases of offenses that have not yet resulted in a ruling to the first deputy of the judiciary for referral to the Branch of the Judiciary. Even in Note 2, the by -law states that if the preliminary court ruling on the offenses has been issued after the resolution of 1/8/11, the appeal or appeal shall be obliged to submit the preliminary court to the First Judiciary for referral to the Branch of the Judiciary.

The defendants' accusations of this case have been the subject of a crime of disrupting the economic system subject to the law of disruptors in the country's economic system. According to the date of referral of the case Advocacy It has been in the jurisdiction of the Special Courts of Economic Crime, and also under paragraph 2 Advocacy It is emphasized that all courts are obliged to submit cases of crimes that have not yet resulted in the verdicts.

At the hearing, the courts of the legal representatives of the banks presented their material on the rial facilities and claims. The official experts of the judiciary also expressed their views.

The defendants and their lawyers were in place and made some explanations.