Tahan Nazif: The Guardian Council agreed to increase the tax discount for the third child

According to Mehr reporter, Tahan clean In a press conference, the spokesman of the Guardian Council, referring to the results of the review of the first part of the 1404 budget bill, stated: The Guardian Council held 18 consecutive meetings to review the budget during this legal period.

He continued: In the first note about Complications and taxes We have a ruling in paragraph A, the figure that was predicted in this budget, is not contrary to the standards of Sharia and the Constitution.

Tahan clean He stated: In the first note, which was about duties and taxes, there was a provision in the bill regarding the exemption limit for individuals, and this limit was set at 7,000 billion Rials for legal entities and 700 billion Rials for natural persons, which is contrary to Sharia and constitutional standards were not recognized.

He continued: about The ruling of the Guardian Council on the tax on luxury passenger cars limited the right of individuals to file lawsuits with judicial authorities and caused problems.

He clarified: Regarding the ruling on the tax on expensive land, the Guardian Council agreed with its entirety, only regarding the right of individuals to file lawsuits and complaints, the Guardian Council found the resolution to be contrary to the constitution.

He said: We did not have objections in the Guardian Council regarding the decree related to the import of cars and the allocation of foreign currency, and the High Board of the Recognition Assembly had objections to this resolution, which we informed the parliament.

The spokesman of the Guardian Council added: The ruling regarding the income tax on salaries of government and non-government employees, which was set at 24 million Tomans, was discussed and reviewed at the meeting of the Guardian Council, and no contradiction with the constitution was found.

Tahan clean He added: There was no objection to the electronicization of freeway accidents in general, but there was ambiguity in the details, which was brought to the attention of the parliament.

He said: The ruling regarding increasing the tax discount for the owners of the third child was not found to be against the law.

Completing…