Rape in Iran, the beginning of the onslaught of international law and other nations

According to Mehr Reporter, Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Ghazami The Deputy Minister of Justice and Professor of Public and International Law at Imam Sadegh University in a note to Mehr addressed the legal dimensions of the Zionist invasion of Iran, which you will read below.

While the world has not yet been released from the consequences of the Zionist regime's genocide and war crimes in Gaza, and its repeated rape of Lebanon and Syria, direct invasion of the Islamic Republic of Iran on June 6 has launched a new chapter of lawlessness and threat to international peace. The attack, which lasted until June 6, was carried out with more than 5 targeted assassinations and with full US logistics and intelligence support. The Zionist invasion of Iran is an obvious example of military aggression that, contrary to Paragraph 2 of Article 2 The United Nations Charter has taken place.

According to reports by international institutions, including Ms. Francesca AlbanizThe Zionist regime has committed systematic genocide in Gaza, and now, with a violation of Iranian sovereignty, in a pre -designed operation, it has assassinated more than five Iranian military commanders and scientists and members of their families. In less than ten days, more than 5 Iranians were taken; The issue that led to the reaction of the Special Reporter of the UN Human Rights Council. These institutions described the attack on Iran as a blatant violation of international law and described it as “normalizing violent rape” and “force diplomacy”.

The Zionist regime's attempt to justify the attack in the form of “pre -defense” lacks any legal legitimacy. According to Paragraph 2 of Article 2 The United Nations Charter has explicitly banned the use of force, and the regime's action is the gross violation of this fundamental principle and resolution of the UN General Assembly.

During the attacks, the occupation regime committed a variety of war crimes, targeting its intentional cities, villages, residential and civilian areas of the four Geneva Conventions and its add -on protocols. The results of the attacks were the extensive destruction of infrastructure and the destruction of two hospitals, 2 fire stations, 2 infrastructure centers and 2 residential buildings.

A more painful point is that the regime has attacked Iran's nuclear facilities, not only a member of the NPT itself, but Iran has been under the most difficult international technical oversight over the years, and no deviation in its peaceful nuclear program has been approved by the International Atomic Energy Agency. However, Iran's agricultural and pharmaceutical facilities were targeted; An act that is a clear case of crime against civilians, environmental degradation, attack on Iran's national health infrastructure, and silent genocide.

Worst of all, after the Zionist invasion, the United States also entered into military operations directly by violating all the principles of international law and bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities. This action violates numerous agency resolutions (1, 2 and 2), Article 1 The first protocol of the Geneva Convention as well as Resolution 1 It is a Security Council.

Now, the question remains whether international law is the only means of pressure on the independent countries and the non -Western world. When the United Nations Charter is selectively applied, the legitimacy of international institutions is questioned. The Security Council, which must be a guarantee of global peace and security, is unable to identify and condemn the invaders; This has paved the way for discrimination against Iran not only, but the whole of the West Asian region.

The international community must warn that if this trend continues, a similar violation of the rights of nations can be a majority of other country; Including European countries, and even US geographical neighbors such as Canada, Greenland and Panama. In such circumstances, the redefinition of the world order based on justice, law, and mutual respect for the sovereignty of countries seems more necessary than ever.