Indirect negotiation of dignity in Oman

Mehr News Agency, Politics Group – Nafiseh Abdollahi: While regional and international developments are taking place with an unprecedented acceleration, Iran's nuclear case and related talks have been returned to the top of the news. Negotiations are to be held indirectly between Iran and the United States, with the mediation of a third country, including Oman. From a strategic point of view, a reflection of stability in the Islamic Republic of Iran's principled positions and the other side's efforts to return to diplomatic realism is considered.

“Iran and the United States will meet in Oman on Saturday for indirect talks at senior officials,” Arakchi, who is on Algeria's trip on Tuesday. This is an opportunity as well as a test. The ball is on the US. “

This round of consultations carries a clear message to the West: Iran is still interacting, but any agreement will only be based on the logic of resistance, the lifting of effective sanctions and practical guarantees.

In the sophisticated and sensitive developments on Iran's nuclear case, Foreign Minister Abbas Arakchi, Abbas Arakchi, has once again attracted the attention of observers and analysts.

Arakchi, who has a long history on the Islamic Republic's diplomacy, has always emphasized an important principle in Iranian foreign policy: “Negotiation, yes – pressure rating, never.In this context, he emphasizes three key components:

1. Preservation of national decision -making independence

Iraqchi has repeatedly stated that the Islamic Republic of Iran will not give a direct conversation with the United States unless Washington's tangible behavioral change is observed. This position, in line with the overall approach of the system, was based on dignity, wisdom and expediency, and showed that Iran was a dialogue, but not at any price.

2. The precedence of sanctions on any new agreement

Another axis of Iraqi stance was the full priority of lifting cruel sanctions. He emphasizes that Iran will only take compensatory steps in the nuclear field if the complete test of sanctions is fulfilled.

This red line prevents Western advertising games from real negotiations and balance.

1. Brightness

From the very beginning, Iraqi warned that efforts to incorporate missile, regional or human rights issues in talks were unacceptable and unacceptable. He explicitly emphasized that “the negotiations are merely defined within the nuclear framework and that any exaggeration beyond will bring the negotiations to a deadlock.”

So;; Abbas Arakchi's clear, authoritative, yet diplomatic positions are a model of dignified diplomacy and committed to the principles of the Islamic Revolution. His positions not only protected national interests, but also showed that Iranian diplomacy can remain in flexibility, ineffective and independent.

From resistance field to indirect diplomacy architecture

In the wake of the intensification of the Zionist air and ground attacks to Lebanon, Iraqchi made a trip to Lebanon on October 5 last year, which many analysts believe were a clear message of his uninterrupted presence in the region's strategic equations.

Iraqchi, who has been at the forefront of the Islamic Republic's nuclear talks and foreign policy for many years, has repeatedly shown that it is not just a formal dialogue. In one of the sensitive diplomatic sessions, when crossing the opposite side of Iran's red lines, it explicitly reacted with its automatic beam and transmitted Iran's position without compliments; A movement that was more than any word carrying the message of authority.

While the indirect negotiations are underway with the mediation of a third party, the presence of a figure such as Iraqchi indicates that the Islamic Republic's diplomacy continues to be a combination of rationality, experience and field approach to secure national interests and consolidate regional equations.

Indirect negotiations; A test for the real will of America

The Islamic Republic of Iran, within the framework of the active resistance strategy and diplomacy, while not returning the path of interaction, emphasizes that no agreement is possible without the fullest implementation of the rights of the Iranian nation and the true lifting of sanctions. Indirect negotiations are considered a test for America's real honesty and will in redirecting its past.