Aref: Country rescue from the route of dialogue is possible

According to Mehr News Agency, the first vice president Mohammad Reza Aref during a recent visit to the Iranian newspaper in a brief interview with media reporters spoke about the achievements of the national consensus approach and emphasized: Route Dialogue Possible Is.

The full text of this conversation is as follows:

In Mr. Medical's government, we see that the reformist tone is different from Mr. Khatami's era. One implication is that this tone change and change of behavior is the result of your meetings with reformists, that is, instead of Sharp The tone of political discussions has defined a kind of large -scale convergence as their agenda. We also see this change in the fundamentalists; Statements by Mr. Bahonar, Zarghami and Pourmohammadi Confirmation This is. When we put these two sections together, the country's rooted political currents and political currents have changed some kind of approach to the country's macro issues, or they feel threatened by Iran and the future of the country. Do you see this change?

If one does not accept that he is a change, he is no longer human. This is the advantage of man. This is a compatibility with the situation without being an opportunity. The reformists had this feature. This has been the case in the past. In Mr. Rouhani's government, the reformists came out very well. Of course they didn't answer. That is, in the five years of the government of hope and hope, the reformists laid the stone. In the 10th Majlis, we had all our prestige for the government, but nothing happened.

Elections that you removed from the competition …

We do not want to personalize the matter, but you saw in the 10th Majlis that nothing happened to national interests. Our strategy (in and out of parliament) was to compromise with our rivals within the system. With these people you named, from parliament Tenth Have had a meeting; Meetings called National Dialogue held in parliament. We announced this strategy. Then we held a session in the parliament. The tenth parliamentary period ended, after which these sessions continued to this day. Our building on this It has been To first talk about the commonalities in which we come to the results. Naturally, there is a time when fundamental differences arise. So sometimes we have to talk about these issues and see what we should do with these issues. Anyway, we are satisfied with this process. We also have regular meetings that we do not make the media. There are occasionally news of it, for example, that it is said that they have had meetings that are okay. The problem is that we want to be effective. Fortunately in this Route We have achieved some achievements. The government of Mr. Medical is also a symbol of this view. That is, the faith that is being raised today was in the essence of their dialogue. She's in the elections. No It was that I would pursue national dialogue or consensus, but the character, the method and the experience he had found, showed that he would seek conversation and consensus. In my opinion, in this government, there is a good platform for service and work, both for reformists and the fundamentalists who disagree with the reformists. This means that if we put aside the extremists, we can work with the middle. We did. Today, we are happy that these two parts of the original political movement are together today. Mr. Medical Government is a set of elite forces. The trend has not been the most important indicator of managers. Competence, ability and Carbaldi Managers were the criterion that was considered in the election of ministers and consequently other managers.

This approach, whether your meetings or the government's approach to executives' elections, has also achieved an emphasis on consensus or dialogue. He supported Mr. Zarghami's filter, the FATF seems to be behind the government. It seems that it is also helping the government in executive decisions.

Yes. The discussion of national dialogue is a look that has been the most essential to sovereignty since the beginning of the 1980s. We had no way of dialogue to save the country and advance development programs. But unfortunately in the 1980s, we faced zigzag fluctuations and movements. Over the decade, we could get better, but in many parts we had retreat. We hope that the government of consensus in this new space will learn from the 1980s and go more rationally and make good achievements.