What is the country's main challenge in the field of marriage?

Mehr News Agency, Community Group; Mistakes of indicators and measures in the area of ​​statistics are the most common approach in the media and some official reports on statistical studies of marriage and divorce. In some cases, the announcement of the wrong statistics or the wrong analysis of the statistics causes a volatile image of a phenomenon and consequently disrupts the solution.

Alireza Lavor A family expert and university lecturer told Mehr reporter that we have many indicators in marriage analysis: The marriage generality index, the life expectancy index in the issue of divorce and the age of marriage are among the important indicators of the family in the field.

He went on to define each of these indicators and stated: The index of life's life is the life of the marriage of those who marry. This is a valuable indicator for sociology analysis. That is, you may live in a society where marriage is low but durable. That is, in such a society, marriage is not necessarily a very problem, and if we divide it by divorce, it is not important because the index of life's durability will be important. The generality of marriage means that people's marriage was about 4.9 percent in the year. It reached 4.9 % in year 2

Lavor He added: “The issue of the generality of marriage is essentially how much there is a desire for this.” Studies show that the generality of marriage means that people's marriage was about 2.9 percent in the year. It reached 4.9 percent in year 2. That is, out of every 2 single people in year 2, about 3 people demanded marriage, and two people said we didn't want to get married at all. But in year 2, 5 people demanded marriage. Here the number of those who did not want to get married has been two observations and reached 2 %. That is, in the past, two percent of people did not want to get married today to 5 percent.

An increase of 2 percent or two percent more?

He emphasized that some media headlines the same number in a different way: “The reporter or a news agency headlines a 2 percent and two -fold increase in those who do not intend to get married.” To say that they didn't want to marry two percent before, now four percent do not want to get married, and this difference is of particular importance in this area. In fact, it is played with statistics and another theme is induced by the audience.

The issue that is very important is that 5 % of young people say we want to get married, and 2 % say that we do not want to get married. It is definitely clear that we have a challenge in the field of marriage, but our main challenge is not.

Our main issue is the increase in the average age of marriage

“Statistics show that the main issue in this area is the increase in the average age of marriage,” he said. The average age of marriage in women is about 5 years and today has reached 5 years. Also, the average age of male marriage per year was about 5 years, which has increased to 5 years today. Therefore, we need to consider the generality of marriage in relation to the age of marriage. That is, five years ago, people decided to get married at an early age due to the social actions and biological models of the people. Five years ago, people decided to marry at an early age due

“I am not saying that the livelihood has improved or worse,” he said of the people's biological model of the decade. But we all know that, regardless of the economic power of the people, the economic model of the economy in the 1980s was different today. Increasing the age of marriage is certain, and this shows all the statistics. On the other hand, the housing index was about 5 years in the year. That is, one could buy a home for 5 years. But in year 2, the housing supply index has reached 5 years. That is, five years after retirement, he may be able to buy a house. The same indicator has a huge impact on the age of marriage.

“So when we provide analytical marriage, we need to determine the statistical index of marriage and complementary indicators,” Lavor said. That is, consider the general issue of marriage, housing supply indicators, and so on.

The university lecturer also pointed to the marriage jigsin in the community: When alternative patterns of marriage are introduced in the community, the individual is chosen. For example, when the media gives a coefficient and illustrates it, promoting a lovely and friendly relationship changes one's lifestyle pattern and expose them to choice. When the pattern of emotional, emotional, and sexual need is with the least responsibility of the coefficient, who with its computational reason is to provide responsibility for the need. ‌