Irvani: France's claim of Iran's nuclear program is baseless

According to Mehr News Agency, Amir Saeed Irvani, Iran's permanent ambassador and representative to the United Nations, said in a letter to the Security Council: The French Foreign Minister's claims that Iran is “on the verge of developing nuclear weapons is completely baseless and politically irresponsible, and the Islamic Republic of Iran has never sought a nuclear weapon.

Iran's permanent representative to the United Nations in a letter to the Security Council Chairman as well as Antonio Guterres“If France and its partners are really looking for a diplomatic solution, they should stop threatening and respect the rule of states under international law,” the UN Secretary -General added.

The letter of the letter of Amir Saeed Irvani, the ambassador and permanent representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations, is as follows:

Believe me Allah al -Rahman al -Rahim

Following the order of my government, thereby giving your attention to the statements High Mr. Jean-Nuel BarrowThe French and Foreign Minister of the French Republic, which was objected to during the UN Security Council's inaugural meeting dated April 7.

In his remarks, the French Foreign Minister made baseless and political motives about the peaceful nuclear program of the Islamic Republic of Iran, including baseless claims that “Iran is on the verge of developing nuclear weapons.”

Such charges are either due to fundamental misunderstanding or deliberate distortion of Iranian legal rights under international law. Such statements also reflect a selective reading of the facts and are an example of the continuous pattern of dual behaviors by a country that is responsible for a permanent member of the Security Council. In this regard, the following points will inform you and the members of the Security Council:

1. Claims that Iran is “on the verge of” nuclear weapons is completely baseless and politically irresponsible. The Islamic Republic of Iran has never sought nuclear weapons and has not changed its defensive doctrine. Iran firmly rejects all weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons.

As a founding member of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, Iran continues to undergo its obligations under the treaty. The International Atomic Energy Agency continues to monitor the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program and verify it; The reports have also been constantly confirmed that no deviation from nuclear material has been made for non -peaceful purposes.

2. The Comprehensive Comprehensive Action Plan was a historical and multilateral achievement that was approved by the Security Council with the adoption of Resolution 2 (1). Disrupting this agreement not because of Iran's actions, but as a result of the illegal and unjustified departure of the United States of America Troica European in fact happened to its economic obligations.

In response, Iran, in response, took more than a year of strategic patience, and then gradually reduced and stopped its obligations in accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Brotherhood. These actions were completely transparent.

1. The apparent threat of the French Foreign Minister to re -impose sanctions that will have “devastating effects” on the Iranian economy is an obvious example of political and economic force. The resort to economic threats and ransom is completely unacceptable and is an explicit violation of the principles of the United Nations Charter.

In addition, France's threat to activating a mechanism called trigger, despite its failure to fulfill its obligations, is in conflict with the fundamental principles of international law; The principles that prevent the violation of the obligations refer to the rights arising out of the agreement. Such acts, from a legal and procedural point of view, are confused, unacceptable, and invalid, and will undermine the credit of the Security Council.

1. While France expresses concern over the dangers of nuclear spread over Iran's peaceful nuclear program, its credibility in the area of ​​non -spreading through its record is severely distorted.

France continues to develop and renovate its nuclear arsenal, refuses to grant unconditional negative security guarantees to non -conditioned countries, is silent about the non -declared Zionist nuclear weapons program, and is still in complicity.

1. The Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates its commitment to diplomacy and constructive interaction. However, real diplomacy cannot go into the space of threat and pressure. If France and its partners are really looking for a diplomatic solution, they must abandon the threat and respect the sovereignty of countries under international law.