A new report from the defendants of the tea case

According to the Judiciary Media Center, according to investigations in the case of tea DebtThe first -tier defendant in the case, despite receiving foreign currency remittances for importing high quality Indian tea, was expressed in inferior and much lower value than tea.

Tea case Debt For the first time, with the report of the Ministry of Intelligence of the Martyr Raisi, the reporter was on the agenda of the judiciary and other agencies have entered the case, in fact, an interaction between the judiciary and the previous government (the Martyr Raisi Government).

The case has revealed a large number of corruption and financial offenses, with four defendants and the issuance of sentences to four of them.

Finally, a major part of the defendants (2 defendants) was issued and sentenced to the sentences of the first -degree sentence to five years in prison, heavy cash penalty and currency extradition.

One of the major and deep frauds of the defendant Akbar Rahimi, the first defendant in the import of tea, is more about the price of tea relevant to the registration of orders leading to the receipt of foreign exchange remittances.

Regardless of the fact that more than 1.5 billion euros of foreign currency remittances issued for the import of tea by the first defendant and the affiliated companies have not been lifted. Rather, there is both fraud and violations of the currency value of the goods in terms of currency remittances whose goods have appeared in the country.

The defendant declares high quality Indian tea in the registration of orders leading to foreign currency remittances, but what comes into the country was Kenyan tea with inferior Indian tea.

In a report sent by the bailiffs, it states: Debt In the field of tea, it expresses several equity in the price of tea in accordance with the union's theory.

For example, a company tea cargo of the company is 1,800 kg of bulk black tea for the price of 1 million and 2 dirhams of the UAE, which is about $ 1.5 per kilo of tea, which is $ 1.5, which is stated by the company. DebtIt is similar to the occasions that are now entering the country. Therefore, the violations of the company have been constantly continuing in recent years, which is definitely determined by reviewing the auditor. In fact, in recent years, the company has expressed exactly all imported loads at maximum prices to benefit from maximum foreign exchange benefits.

One of the notable points in the recently inspected cargo documents is the contradiction of the information with reality, so that the registration of the number 2 of black tea goods from the origin of India and the United Arab Emirates, but the invoice for the sale of goods in the declared documentary documents is by Joe of Cup in Narubian city; Therefore, the stated burden is contrary to the declared commodity, which is explicitly stated in the union's report, and this issue is also visible in the bill of lading.

Another reflective point is the inconsistencies of the production of Darjoling tea by the group Debt It is with the import rate of the company. On the other hand, the import of $ 4 -tea (luxury tea) into the country has no rational justification because it does not fit the price of Darjeling tea unless other tea packages are offered at low price in Mashhad.

In addition, the review of the load containers in Bandar Abbas suggests that the tea as a Darjaling, the Kenya CTC tea was about $ 1. Overall low prices of group products DebtThe import of poor quality tea is confirmed by the registration of the company's orders.

To say, tea case Debt With the complaint of the Central Bank and the public and private banks known as the plaintiffs (Bank Mellat, National Bank, Export, Parsian, Workers' Welfare, Middle East, Pasargad, Future, Industry and Entrepreneurship and Iran Land) and numerous reports that the Ministry of Intelligence, the State Inspection Organization, Customs and Customs Faith They made and Reports They were formed to the supervisory authorities.