The decline of amnesty international in the Zionist rape mirror

According to Mehr News Agency, Hassan Abdulian Pour, head of the Bar Center, official experts and family advisers, wrote in a note: Following a biased report by Amnesty International, in which the Islamic Republic of Iran has been accused of using clustered bombs, while the soil of southern Iran is still re -raped.

First, its accounting silence against the obvious violation of the fundamental principles of international law by the Zionist regime, which is no longer described by the word “infringement”, but in the realm of war crimes, indicates that Amnesty International is not an international observer.

Violation of Article 5 of the United Nations Charter on the prohibition of force, disregard for the principle of separation and proportion explicitly stated in the Geneva Conventions (1), a targeted attack on civilians and health centers, and ultimately the use of prohibited weapons. The deviant, the place of the subject and the object in which it is deliberately reversed.

Secondly, the accusation in Iran does not have any reference or confirmation of international independent supervisor. On the contrary, field evidence, satellite images, documentary humanitarian reports, and independent reporters all testify that the Zionist regime has targeted civilian infrastructure and utilized the radius of the radius, but the radius of destruction from the power of the military.

Thirdly, Amnesty International, which must be committed to the principles of neutrality, independence and documentation, has now become an institution that is not subject to reality, but rather a balance of power in the geopolitical field of Western. The elimination of the invading name, the silence of blood, and the media focus on an unprofitable accusation have removed the organization from its legal position that even the global audience no longer recognizes it as a supervisory body.

Fourthly, under Article 5 of the United Nations Charter, the right to legitimate defense for a country undergoing armed rape is fundamental and unreliable. Iran, as a government that has been targeted by the Zionist regime's direct attack, has been obliged to protect its citizens in the use of its defense capacities, but under international law. No psychological operations, no coordinated news, and no international institution, even with the coverage of “human rights”, can reverse this fact.

Accordingly, the following are emphasized as formal and analytical positions:

1. Amnesty International must respond to its systematic bias on the Zionist regime's war crimes and clarify its long -standing silence against the killing of Iranian civilians.

2. The international legal community cannot be indifferent to the transformation of human rights institutions into a means of political pressure. The continuation of this process will not only deprive the legitimacy of international law from within, but it will destroy the validity of its fundamental principles to the world's public opinion.

1. Independent nations, especially in the south of the world and West Asia, have bitter and repeated experiences of dual standard in international institution reports. Now is the time that the courageous and documented rethinking of these dual functions be regarded as the moral and historical responsibility of governments and legal elites.

1. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, citing the right to legitimate defense in accordance with Article 5 of the United Nations Charter, reserves the right to respond to Zionist aggression, and the attempt to reduce this legitimate defense to suspicious or violations is a kind of structured and immoral distortion of international legal order.

In the end, it is warned that the continuation of the reversal of the facts, the legitimacy of the transgressor, and the narrative against the victim will not only destroy the dignity of international institutions in the long run, but will make them among the partners of crime, not impartial observers.